Scripture’s Most Important
Timed Prophecies
(Daniel 12 – Part Two of Three)
Two Witnesses at the River
The visions called the chazown (ha hazon) are completed in Daniel 12:4. That composite was/is a preface to greater revelations in how the end will be choreographed. It unveils the most intense conflict earth will ever witness between good and evil. What now follows is a judicial scene where Christ appears personally the third time before Daniel. Each debut is marked by a timing missive. Urgency is instilled into the prophetic messages because they are embedded in time.
Immediately preceding the appearance of the Divine Man, Daniel observes “two others.”
“Then I Daniel looked, and, behold, there stood other two, the one on this side
of the bank of the river, and the other on that side of the bank of the river”
(12:5).
Scholars note that these “two”
serve as witnesses to the oath that Christ will soon take. In the Law of Moses a
minimum of two such individuals were required for a case to proceed (Deuteronomy
Since Daniel now resumes a first person narrative, it is probable that he is one of those witnesses. “One of them” asked Christ questions. Daniel appears to be the questioner and the one eager for understanding (12:8). This is affirmed by this expositor: “A wonderful connection is seen between the universe of heaven and this world. The things revealed to Daniel were afterward complemented by the revelation made to John on the Isle of Patmos. These two books should be carefully studied. Twice Daniel inquired, How long shall it be to the end of time? [Daniel 12:6, 8]”[1]
These witnesses are on either
side of the bank of a river. Though it is tempting to identify this as the
The word here for river (yeor)
is used in a variety of ways in the Old Testament. Though anciently referencing
the
The next verse is pivotal to this chapter. It is the catalyst to understand the expression “time of the end” and its time prophecies.
“And one said to the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the
river, How long shall it be to the end of these wonders?” (12:6).

“One of them” is Daniel. He writes similarly as John the Revelator, mixing third and first person commentary. Within two verses: “I, Daniel, looked” and “before me” … “one of them said.” When Jesus speaks, “I heard him.” Daniel, clearly, is an auditory and visual witness to this solemn scene.
The “man clothed in linen” is identified as Christ by many scholars[3] – especially by the words “clothed in linen.” The word “clothed” (labesh) refers to totally clothed since “white linen” is plural. This usually refers to the High Priest’s dress on the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16:4) and is described here in chapter 12 and Daniel 10:5 (cf. Ezekiel 9:2-3, 11; 10:2, 6-7). This is Christ in a High Priestly mission. Note: In chapter 10 He was king, priest and judge. Here, the imagery is only as priest. What could that mean? Let’s analyze.
A final Atonement is in view.
Prophecy is being unfolded when the last preparation for eternity is about to
occur. That event is noted also in Revelation 8:3-5. The images presented by
both Daniel and John are of the same
period. His identity is with those who sigh and cry for the sins of the people
(Ezekiel 9:4). They will be marked with the “cross shaped”
taw on their foreheads, noting their
eternal security.[4]
The Ulai “people” (cf. Revelation
Elsewhere in Daniel Jesus is
called “the Prince of the host
[arms]” (
The phrase
“upon the waters” (vs 6 and repeated in vs 7) denotes “over or above the
waters,” symbolizing “protection over.” It is not imagery like that of Christ
with one foot upon the sea and the other on the earth (Revelation 10:2; cf.
Revelation
Our High Priest, our Intercessor, is protecting His end-time people and is about to present to them one of Scripture’s most important and hopeful prophecies – the most important time prophecy in the Bible. It is conveyed directly seven times in the Scripture to rivet its unparalleled importance, and many more ways in labels such as “appointed time.”
Daniel Converses with Jesus
In chapter 8 Daniel heard Jesus and Gabriel conversing (8:13-14, 16); in chapter 10 he saw and heard Jesus (10:5-8); here in Daniel 12 he not only sees and hears but is privileged to ask Him questions.
“And one said to the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the
river, How long shall it be to the end of these wonders?” (12:6).
“The light that Daniel received from God
was given especially for these last days. The visions he saw by the banks of the
Ulai and the Hiddekel, the great rivers of
The question that Daniel poses
is exactly the same as the one Gabriel conveyed to Jesus in
Daniel does add two qualifiers here in 12:6! The words “end” and “wonders.” This embellishes the meaning of ad-matay! The word for “end” is qes. This usually refers to a judicial end. Something legal is to be completed. Daniel is asking “when” that will occur contextually. A Day of Atonement is key to Daniel 8–12. “Wonders” (pelaot) is a feminine plural noun and refers to God’s acts of judgment and redemption.[7]
"Wonders" is preceded by an article,
revealing that it alludes to something specific and precise! What divine acts
were noted in the previous verse and prophecy? –
(1) The
deliverance of God’s people and
(2) a special resurrection (12:1-2) – plural
wonders. These two events are judicial acts. They reflect a response to a prior
judgment. Something has occurred and ended to permit these happenings!
Pelaot is found only here as a
particular Hebrew expression in the Old Testament.[8]
Daniel’s concern especially
relates to
when this period of time (ha
hazon vision of satanic opposition to Christ and His people) will end with
the deliverance of those saints and that special resurrection. “The phrase looks
toward the final events of history and the end of the world at the return of
Christ.”[9]
When Daniel asked “Until
when”
will the deliverance and special resurrection
end? – he implied the full period of
events which extended from
Jesus now takes center stage. He begins a crucial series of timing prophecies that define the details of that terminal period. We now enter the most important end-time prophecy in Scripture. Satan knows that. Resistance to an end-time understanding of this chapter is filled with more emotion and hostility than any other in Scripture. As we will see, these periods are sacred and in an aura of utmost solemnity as they unfold!
Daniel sees High Priest Jesus above His people. Now He speaks:
“And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river,
when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him
that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when
he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these
things shall be finished” (12:7).
Once again Daniel is excited
enough at what is occurring that he asserts to his readers:
“I
heard the man clothed in linen.”
– i.e., “What you are about to study is really true. I saw Jesus and talked
with Him. He actually spoke these timing prophecies to me!” What caused this
fascinating assertion (while again repeating the “man clothed in linen”
description) is related to what Jesus did. This is Daniel’s narrative:
“And sware by him that liveth for ever and ever” (12:7)
Daniel heard him
when he took that oath, invoking
God’s name [“him that liveth for ever”] (Revelation 10:6) – an
appropriate expression of God the Father (Deuteronomy 32:40, I Timothy
This is a fascinating and most sacred event. One God invoking the name of another God as a guarantor of what He is about to divulge! Can anything in the universe have a greater endorsement than this? What Christ is about to declare, every thinking being should understand and grasp! He is about to reveal when the great controversy will end (not the Second Coming) and gives the assurance that there will be a holy people!
Two witnesses are observing
divine certification proceedings over the waters of the
This ties directly to Daniel
“he held up his right hand and his left hand to heaven” (12:7)
Lifting up the right hand is an oath (“solemnly swear”) of promise to be truthful (Genesis 14:22, Deuteronomy 32:40, Ezekiel 20:5-6, Revelation 10:5-6).
It was a Biblical custom to
raise only one hand (Genesis 14:22, Deuteronomy 32:40, Isaiah 62:8, Ezekiel
20:5, Revelation 10:5-6) in an oath.[12]
That led to the idiomatic phrase “to lift up the hand” – meaning “to take an
oath” (Psalm 106:26).
Putting a hand under the thigh
of another was a way to swear against the life of all future seed (Genesis
24:2, 47:29).
The Jews later inappropriately
swore by their head – a mental assent – in the name of heaven, earth,
Jerusalem and the temple (Matthew 5:34-36). Jesus didn’t like that and
expressly forbade it.
When the left hand is raised,
it is an oath offering the individual’s blood. The left relates to
loss of life in many symbols.
Christ’s
declaration (Matthew 25:31-33, 41). “When the Son of man shall come in his
glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne
of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall
separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth
his sheep from the goats: And he
shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left…. Then
shall he say also unto them
on the left hand, Depart from
me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his
angels.” They were to experience the eternal death.
In the
general purification ritual, the ashes of a red heifer were used (Numbers
19:2-10). When it was slaughtered, the blood was received into the left hand
and transferred to the right, when it was then sprinkled towards the
In demon mythology and Satanism today, the oath is with the left hand – with a death association, i.e., loss of life. In the Inquisition Lyrics (2002), invoking the majestic throne of Satan, the left hand is used, appealing to Lucifer’s blood.[13]
___________________________________________
Jesus is saying by this act: “I
pledge my blood to validate that this will occur.” Can you grasp what is
happening?! Do you perceive the stunning imagery that those divine Beings, who
are over all, are staging?! In redemptive prophetic history we are admonished to
look at and beyond
“And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb” (Revelation 7:14, 12:11). The left-hand oath confirmed that High Priest Jesus would shed His blood as a judicial “eternal death” gesture so that we can symbolically wash our characters in that divine “detergent.” Whiteness and purity are the outcome.
“And they overcame him [Satan]
by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not
their lives unto the death” (Revelation
The theological issues in this one Danelic act are deep and profound. Christ shed His blood to assure the deliverance of God’s people and the resurrection of the saints. The imagery is that of a great judiciary summation of redemption. It will occur – the highest court has ruled. There are witnesses. It is also set within, as is all apocalyptic prophecy, a framework of time. That adds urgency to our understanding.
There is precedence for God
swearing by himself (Genesis
“Sware” is
Stunning is this judicial
ordeal that accompanies what Christ is about to say.
He is telling us, “I’m going
to let you ‘test’ the validity of what I’m going to tell you.”
If I die and am raised, the timing prophecy that I will give will be utterly, 100%, unequivocally true!
Jesus (the Man in linen) and
God (the Eternal) are called in together in a
validation ceremony of a
timing prophecy!
Is that powerful – or what?
Why would such imagery
accompany a prophecy – a timing prophecy? The end of the controversy with
sin is framed within those timing periods. It is what gives urgency to the
Loud Cry. Like Noah’s 120 years that ended with the flood (but deliverance
was provided for him and his family), so Jesus’ specific timing of three and
a half years ends with the deliverance of His people!
Jesus is “sevening” Himself
against the perfect name of God that this is true. Sin will have an end when it
occurs. It will be glorious for the saints.
The Old and New Covenants are
based upon such promises of God. Daniel 11 notes that the King of the North will
have indignation against the holy covenant (vs 30). He will do wickedly against
the holy covenant (vs 32). Why? When it is given to the saints, Satan will be
defeated.
NOW – we come to the time when
Jesus describes
what He guarantees. This is what the
validation ceremony is all about!
Timing Prophecies
“it shall be for time, times, and an half” (vs 7)
Whenever there is a vital
timing prophecy, Jesus (not Gabriel) personally gives it to Daniel. “The
prophetic periods [time segments – plural] of Daniel extending to this very eve
[shortly before] of the great consummation [Second Coming throw a flood of
light on events then [future] to transpire.”[15]
Daniel 12 is “end of time”
and encompasses the “last scenes of this earth’s history [last generation].”[16]
Jesus said previously that this would be after the 2300 years (Daniel
Remember the question? Daniel is wanting insight into a period of time that ends with deliverance and the special resurrection: “it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished” (Daniel 12:7). That “it shall be” is a pointed response to Daniel’s question “until when will this vision end?” – “It shall be.”
“Time, times, and an half [a time]”
is similar to the phrase of
Examples of how it is used:[18]
Birth of a child (Genesis
Season of a bird’s migration
(Jeremiah 8:7)
Appointed time (I Samuel 13:8,
Time a vision is intended
(Habakkuk 2:3)
Time of the end when a vision
was unfolded (Daniel
Time for a festival (Leviticus
23:2); collectively, moade (moedim)
Time of solemnity (Deuteronomy
31:10)
An appointed sign (Judges
Place of worshiping or
assembly (Isaiah
When
hag moed is used, it refers to the
three “great feasts.” When ohel moed
is used, it refers to the place of meeting or tent of meeting. In the context of
Daniel’s use of moed, it refers to:
When the vision is intended
An appointed time God has
predetermined
At the end of time
In this setting, the final restoration of God’s people is in view. Moed, in this context, ties to the Day of Atonement – an annual feast day when God’s people are delivered and become holy. Those ancient Jewish feasts were also prophecies of how the “ends” (First and Second Advents) would unfold.[19]
In Daniel
In spite of all the daily,
weekly, monthly (on new moons) sacrifices, sin had not been fully atoned for[20]
until the time when this applies!
This reflects the highest
exhibition of the High Priest’s work. It is the time when sins are legally
atoned for and removed.
It is when deliverance finally
comes to God’s people.
It is the great festival day of fasting that has survived in Judaism as the day of cleansing – or purification.
It is a “Sabbath of solemn
rest” (Leviticus
If “time” (moed)
here represents the appointed time of Atonement, and it does, it is annual
(Exodus 30:10) – a solar year. It is a specific period of time each fall.
Combining Daniel
At the end of time, there is
an appointed time when holiness/cleansing comes in. It occurs during, and
lasts, an “appointed time,” “appointed times” and “half an appointed time.”
A year, two years, half a year
or three and a half years.
Daniel’s timing question as to when it ends has been answered. Jesus wants to refine the events of these periods further. That will be in our next study. We can now begin to see why there are so many three and a half year periods in Revelation.
See Appendixes III and IV in preparation to Part Three of this study (endtimeissues.com – Newsletter section).
[1]
White, Ellen G.; Testimonies to
Ministers, pp. 115-116 (1896).
[2]
Collins, John J.; Daniel
(Fortress Press, Minneapolis, MN – 1993), p. 399.
[3]
Miller, Stephen R.;
The New American Commentary,
vol. 18 (Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1994), p. 322.
[4]
Steinman, Andrew E.; Daniel
(Concordia Publishing House,
[5]
White, Ellen G.; Testimonies to
Ministers, pp. 112-113 (1896).
[6]
Miller, Op. cit., p. 322.
[7]
Steinman, Op. cit., p. 565.
[8]
Lucas, Ernest C.; Daniel
(Intervarsity Press,
[9]
Steinman, Op. cit., p. 564.
[10]
Lucas, Op. cit., p. 296.
[11]
Whitcomb, John C.; Daniel
(Moody Press; Chicago, IL - 1985),
p. 165.
[12]
Tenney, Merrill C.; Pictoral
Encyclopedia of the Bible, (Zondervan;
[14]
Harris, R. Laird; Theological
Wordbook of the Old Testament, vol II, p. 900.
[15]
White, Ellen G.; The Review and
Herald,
[16]
White, Ellen G.; Testimonies to
Ministers, pp. 114-115 (1896).
[17]
Brown, Driver and Briggs, Lexicon.
[18]
Harris, Op. cit., pp.
388-389.
[19]
White, Ellen G.; The Great
Controversy, pp. 399-400.
[20]
Tenney, as quoted in Harris, Op.
cit., vol. I, p. 413.
Franklin S.
Fowler, Jr., M.D.; Prophecy Research Initiative © 2010
EndTime Issues…