End-Time Narrative Emerges

(Daniel 7 – Part Three)

 

“I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake: I beheld even till the beast was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame” (Daniel 7:11).

 

Verses 9 and 10 addressed the judgment. Suddenly we pick up what initially appears to be a continuation of verse 8. The judicial scene in heaven was given as a “commentary insert.” God simply was saying, “Before we go on with the little horn story, at some point after that power is energized with words defying God, a divine judicial proceedings will get underway.”

 

The last observation Daniel had of that little horn was of its eyes and then its mouth speaking blasphemy against God. The prophetic story now picks up from there.

 

“I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake:” (vs 11)

 

The NIV translation is clearer: “Then I continued to watch because of the boastful words the horn was speaking.” Daniel does not record what he heard. His attention is riveted on the “words” more than the supernatural “talking horn.” The seer has been a committed loyalist to God. He has unselfishly sought to elevate His honor. One can only assume that what the horn is saying is opposite to what Daniel believes.

 

Many scholars conclude that because of the story sequence, the divine court (vss 9-10) put this horn on trial. That could easily be assumed. But the Bible doesn’t say that. The literary structure is of a “commentary insert” for verses 9 and 10, so common in prophetic prose. Neither the beast nor the little horn is brought before the court! Verse 11 brings a major shift in time to this little horn narrative.

 

“I beheld even till the beast was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame” (vs 11)

 

The Danelic sequence directs us to this summary thinking:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A trilogy is introduced – a tool ancient writers often used for emphasis.

 

Slain

Destroyed

Burning Flame

 

John describes the same scene in the apocalypse: “And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone” (Revelation 19:20). This is what Daniel is seeing in 7:11!

 

In Revelation it is sequenced after Christ’s second coming. A most helpful apocalyptic, event-driven resume is in chapter 19, associated with that text:

  

Daniel sees a judgment process begin and John notes in a later prophecy (Revelation 11:1) when the judgment of the church and its living worshipers begins. That is the final judicial phase of the judgment. Initially, therefore, it must have been a review of those who had already died. This distinction is further noted in Revelation 7. John and one of the 24 elders are discussing who the innumerable throng was around the throne. Finally, that elder said:

 

Therefore, one can reasonably conclude that the first part of the judicial process in Daniel is of those who have died – the second part in Revelation, those living right at the end.

 

Atonement vs Trumpets in Judicial Imagery

 

The Feast of Trumpets was a unique time each fall for the Jewish nation. It always began on a Sabbath with the blowing of the Shofar (ram’s horn) (Numbers 29:1).

 

What does all this mean?

 

"In the trial imagery," writes Rabbi Irving Greenberg, "the shofar blast communicates: Oyez! Oyez! This court is in session! The Right Honorable Judge of the World is presiding!"[1]

 

This call, to make all things right with God, comes because the court is now in session.[2] The implication is: “Your name is about to come under review.”

 

Thus, the imagery in Daniel and Revelation draw on the judgment scenes symbolized by the time of the Trumpet Feast, urgently anticipating the sacred time of Atonement.

 

Therefore, in Daniel’s apocalypse, it would begin with an Atonement setting – and in the Book of Revelation, with the final Trumpet (Shofar) call!

 

Rabbinical literature refers to the time of Trumpets as when the books are opened for the living.[4] If preparation was incomplete at the end of this trial, the person was eternally lost (Leviticus 23:29).

 

When does this all occur? There is a direct link to an end-time little horn in Daniel 8. The same metaphors are used, but then Days of Atonement (evening–morning) are used when holiness will be vindicated or adjudicated (qodesh nisdaq) (Daniel 8:14). An end is anticipated in promise! That is part of the noted mareh vision which had a beginning in 458 B.C. (see endtimeissues.com, October 2007 issue, as to why it is not 457 B.C.) (Daniel 9:24-25 is also the same mareh vision – a continuation of the 8:14 verse of the previous chapter.)

 

The whole setting of chapters 7–12 are filled with legal issues in a courtroom/witness setting. It reflects the final stages of the conflict between Christ and Satan. Therefore, the blowing of the Trumpet or Shofar as a ram’s horn is figurative of the final call from Jesus the “Ram of God” before earth’s close! When the last Atonement comes, all decisions will be final. There will be no court of appeal.

 

That coincides with the blowing of a trumpet on the Day of Atonement, when a Jubilee begins.

 

Speaking of this time, expositor White was insightful when she wrote: “Then commenced the jubilee, when the land should rest.”[5] The land won’t rest until Christ’s second coming. Thus, dramatic imagery is opened to our study.

 

Onset of Judgment (Daniel 7:9-10):

 

Trumpet voices on Sabbath (Revelation 1:10) begin the second judicial phase (cf. 4:1-3, 11:1).

 

Since we can ascertain when the judgment begins initially, are there clues to tell when the judicial process starts for the living? They are distinct and clear. This is discussed elsewhere (see endtimeissues.com, Newsletters 107, 118 and 119).

 

“As concerning the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time” (Daniel 7:12).

 

This verse is pivotal to understanding the rest of this book. The historical span of the beast is restricted. Clearly in 7:11, an end-time mention of the fourth beast and little horn is presented. But now a new level of thinking is introduced – just in case what was just said is missed. If the beast (ancient Roman Empire) and the little horn (papacy, which immediately followed) go to the end of time when they are killed, there must be a reapplication of those symbols at the end!!

 

Speaking of these other three beasts, “their dominion had been taken away,” with God implied as the agent of action [historical imagery].[6] But these beasts were allowed to live on till the judgment of the court was complete and the final end comes.

 

This picture coincides with Nebuchadnezzar’s metallic image when all the kingdoms come to an end at one time (Daniel 2:35, 44-45).[7] Again – a reapplication of these symbols as end-time metaphors is given. Understanding that helps to see the deep meaning of Daniel 8–12, when that imagery is repeated during earth’s final era. There is a kingdom reapplication. That is why “Babylon” is noted so much in Revelation when it “falls”!

 

“I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him” (Daniel 7:13).

 

“I saw in the night visions,” (vs 13)

 

Daniel has already informed us that these revelations were “upon his bed” (vs 1) at “night” (cf. 7:2). The first person statements are frequent in these missives: “I saw” – “I beheld” – “I considered.” This time he reminds us of the night, perhaps because the drama of viewing divine beings now makes an image transition as he recalls the experience.

 

“and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven,” (vs 13)

 

God has, once again, drawn his attention from the earth to the heavenly court. There is a sequence between this verse and verses 9 and 10.

The Son of man enters the courtroom when the judicial process is either underway or completed. The context must drive our understanding.

 

The “Son of man” is a phrase that Jesus applied to Himself (Matthew 24:30, 25:31, 26:64; Mark 13:26, 14:62; Luke 21:27). Most of those are in the setting of His Second Coming. In the Old Testament it is used 107 times, making clear that it refers to a human being. God refers to Ezekiel with these words 93 times. Thus, the allusion is simply that Daniel is seeing someone “like” a human being.[8] Specifically – the Qumran text of Daniel does not state “Son of man.” It is “one like a human being.” The “Son of man” wording was started around 100 A.D. in 4 Ezra and 1 Enoch 46. Contextually, the imagery and its setting show that He is more than a mere human.[9] Embellishing the focus on Jesus Himself, within the context of that New Testament apocalypse, Jesus directs biblical expositors to go to Daniel (Matthew 24:15, Mark 13:14). Thus, the attention is drawn to the Messiah who is in an end-time era.

 

Scholars still debate who this “man” might be. In verse 18 the saints of the “Most High” refer back to this “Son of man” through the “kingdom” portrayal. Only a divine being would have “saints” or holy beings. Daniel is observing the Messiah. This is also the prevalent view among ancient Jews.

 

Intriguing is Christ’s parable of the sower (Matthew 13:24, 43). It is the Son of Man who sowed good seed (vss 24, 37). He has a kingdom (v 41; cf. v 38), which unfolds in a judicial setting where good and bad have their rewards. This has been studied extensively, and the allusions to Daniel 7:13 and 14 in an end-time setting are amazing and stunning.[10] Thus, this Daniel 7 picture of judgment and Christ’s coming forward our understanding to an end-time message.

 

The evidence strengthens through the apostle John, when He observes a being he refers to as “one like a Son of man” (Revelation 1:13 and 14:14), which is an exact translation of the Aramaic here in Daniel 7:13. John’s observation is accompanied by it being Jesus (Revelation 1:18), and his description (Revelation 1:13-15) is similar to what Daniel saw (Daniel 10:4-6, 10), referring to “a certain man”!

 

The dual nature of Christ as true man and true God is implicit in Daniel 7:13 and 14. He is “like” man who comes to God to receive His kingdom. Jesus and the time of the end are both in view.

 

“came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him” (vs 13)

 

Clouds are associated often with deity (Exodus 13:21-22, 19:9, 16; I Kings 8:10-11; Isaiah 19:1; Jeremiah 4:13; Ezekiel 10:4; Matthew 24:30, 26:64; Mark 13:26; cf. I Thessalonians 4:17, Revelation 1:7, Acts 1:9-11).[11]

 

Jesus had told four of His disciples that the sign of His coming directly related to “clouds.”

 

Once again, merging imagery of the “Son of man” with “clouds,” “kingdom” and “coming” are terms associated with earth’s last period of time (Psalm 18:10, 97:2-4, 104:3; Isaiah 19:1; Nahum 1:3).

 

His coming to the Ancient of Days is one of the few Old Testament examples alluding to a separation between the Son of God and God the Father. Coming on clouds suggests that He is about to return to planet earth. Since that is the sign of the Second Coming.

 

“And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed” (Daniel 7:14).

 

“And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom,” (vs 14)

 

The sequence of vision events must be reviewed to understand the context:

 

      Babylon (lion)

            Medo-Persia (bear)

                  Greece (leopard)

                        Rome (non-descript beast)

                              Papal Rome (little horn)

                                    Courtroom judicial process begins (judgment by God the Father)

                                          Reapplication of the beast

                                                Christ on clouds moves to Ancient of Days

                                                      Christ – Son of Man – receives His eternal kingdom

 

To receive His kingdom, Jesus becomes king. Because of this sequence, it connot refer to the inauguration of Christ, when He ascended to heaven. Yet Paul also says: “Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father” (Philippians 2:9-11).

 

The evidence suggests that Christ received the legal standing of kingship upon His ascension. But that “function” was delayed until another key mission was complete. He took up dominion over the church first:

 

“Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places, Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come: And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church, is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all” (Ephesians 1:20-23).

 

Though Jesus is noted to be on His Father’s throne (Revelation 3:21; cf. Hebrews 1:3, Acts 2:33), after the ascension He is depicted in a priestly role by Paul. This role is one of being “pastor” and “mediator” of the incredible benefits of the Cross. He is ruling on the “throne of grace” (Hebrews 4:16). When He comes, He is shown as “King of kings, and Lord of lords” (Revelation19:16). When does that occur? At the seventh Trumpet, right at the very end.

 

The imagery of Daniel 7:13-14 was first presented in Psalms 2 and 110. Jesus connects Psalm 110 with Daniel 7 in Matthew 26:64 and Mark 14:62. Stephen saw these events at his martyrdom (Acts 7:55-56).

 

Thus, Christ now reigns over the kingdom of grace. He is functioning as a High Priest – especially as the judgment process moves forward by the Ancient of Days. Jesus can be seen as our attorney and friend in that courtroom scene. Just before He comes the second time, He receives the kingship of the “physical kingdom.” When He comes – that will have occurred!

 

Why was a kingdom given to Him?

 

“that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him:” (vs 14)

 

This means that when Christ’s kingdom is established, it will be a physical “government” that is a secure place for all peoples, nations and languages. All other kingdoms in this vision are real and tangible. Contextually – so will Christ’s kingdom be.

 

“his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed” (vs 14)

 

This reveals that His universal kingdom comes at the end of the great plan of redemption. Christ’s dominion and rule will be forever.

 

Another judicial process is announced in Revelation.

 

 

[This is when the review of all records of those not saved occurs.]

 
Revelation 20:4, 12

I saw thrones
”They” (saints) sat on them
Judgment given to them
Books were open

 

The evidence suggests two phases of judgment:

  1. Led by Ancient of Days
  1. Led by saints (millennial) – after Second Coming

 

“And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever” (Daniel 2:44).

 

The vision has ended. Gabriel then comes to help Daniel with explanations and further clues as to what is occurring.

References:

[1] Rabbi Irving Greenberg, The Jewish Way. Living the Holidays (New York, 1988), p. 195.

[2] Ibid., pp. 186-195.

[3] Ibid., p. 186.

[4] Bacchiochi, Samuele; God’s Festivals, vol. 2, p. 59.

[5] White, Ellen G.; Broadside 3, April 7, 1847; cf. Early Writings, p. 35.

[6] Steinmann, Andrew E.; Daniel (Concordia Publishing House – St. Louis), p. 354.

[7] Goldingay, John E.; DanielWord Biblical Commentary, vol. 30 (Word Books – Dallas, TX), p. 166.

[8] Steinmann, op. cit., p. 356.

[9] Miller, Stephen R.; The New American Commentary, vol. 18 (Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1994), p. 207.

[10] Collins, John J.; Daniel (Fortress Press, Minneapolis, MN – 1993), pp. 90-105.

[11] Whitcomb, John C.; Daniel (Moody Press; Chicago, IL – 1985), p. 98.

[12] Collins, op. cit., p. 311.

 

Franklin S. Fowler, Jr., M.D.; Prophecy Research Initiative © 2011

EndTime Issues…, Number 123, June 9, 2011